Monday, March 4, 2013

The EXPENSIVE Sign War Begins


Laura Maczka is spending big dollars on signs and is now starting to put them out. There happens to be one at Renner and Plano that is probably going to get damaged or disappear (installer problems or the March winds). According to her email sent out a 4'X8" sign costs about $50 a piece! So listen up, chimps!

Her email follows:


Actual graphics name- "Maczka_MailChimp_Banner.png"

Exciting Campaign Happenings

Yard Signs and Social Media, Help Us Spread the Message!

Our campaign's yard signs and large signs are here and they need good homes. If you would like a sign or have a perfect spot for a large sign, please click here and we will get them to you. The large signs are 4 feet by 8 feet and a campaign volunteer will install them for you!

These signs are going to look great! Also, surprisingly, they cost money. So while you may not have a perfect spot, you could help Laura afford them. Can you make a contribution to help her pay for them? Each large sign costs about $50. You can help by making a donation now --- just click here. Every contribution will be put to good use in helping to get the word out about Laura.

There are many other ways you can help Laura spread her message. Click here to join her growing list of supporters, volunteer for the campaign, host a meet-and-greet, and more! Do you use social media? One of the easiest things to do is to like and follow Laura on Facebook and Twitter, and be sure to share her page with your friends, family, and colleagues.

Thank you!

Sign-Up, for Signs!

There are lots of ways you can help. Just click one of the links below and let Laura know that you’d like a yard sign, to get involved, or to help her finance a strong campaign so that she can spread the message.



Spread the Message

There are already over 1,000 of our neighbors who have endorsed Laura. Have you? Sign-Up to endorse by clicking the "Take Action" button, Like or Follow Laura on Facebook and Twitter, and be sure to share with your friends!


2 comments:

  1. When do you suppose she will update her photo from 20 years ago? She ain't that young looking any more. Is that just another form of deceptive advertising we should add to the "normal" category in Richardson?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have heard that before, and maybe my eyesight is getting a bit worse, but it looks like a relatively current photo of her. If there is doubt, I am pretty sure she would be willing to answer the question if asked.

    ReplyDelete