Richardson Mayor Lobbys for Higher Taxes
-
[image: shakedownsm]
Promising retribution against elected officials in higher offices, City of
Richardson Mayor, Paul Voelker and other local special int...
Landlords Fight Back!
-
Last month, an association of landlords sued the city of Omaha along with a
couple of city code inspectors in federal court.Landlords file federal
complain...
Residential Rental Registration Revisions
-
Residential Rental Registration and Inspection Revisions were passed in a
consent agenda vote, no discussion or comments. I don’t know if the new
ordinan...
Dallas high crime areas that feed RISD
-
We have our own problems, but we import a significant amount from Dallas.
Car thefts that are nav-tracked south down US75, robbery and burglary
suspects w...
What was the point?
-
Why did we waste our time going to all those forums?
Why did the candidate's waste their time walking all of those
neighborhoods?
Why did anyone waste any...
Where is the public input opportunity in this public meeting on public business? Looks to me like they should be having these meetings in the train station. The people are getting railroaded.
The fact that meetings are open to the public does not mean that all meetings include arrangements for public comment. There are two public hearings and there is a means of submitting comment to the Charter Commission. All this, plus schedules, agendas, and minutes are on the City web at http://www.cor.net/index.aspx?page=2019
I will watch this later, but is there any place in the video that has new news or anything controversial? So far, it's "and ... or ... comma ... capitalize ..." All important to the correctness of the document, but not exactly must-see-TV.
Grammar and punctuation are important because these people do not seem to grasp the importance of the working aspects of the document. And all the while Pete Smith is telling telling them these are not material changes. But they are very big changes! The charter's purpose is to limit their authority. And to define what limited authority they do have. The last time Pete Smith was charged to charter changes, he actually offered such vague language the council can call a meeting anywhere in the world. It was bad enough they called one while in Austin in 2006. But then that explains the change to legitimize the 2006 improper meeting. Oh, and did I mention the meeting was a closed session? At that time they had no authority to have a closed session.
Look. The make up of the commission with little exception tells you what you need to know. This commission is intended to fix a bit to fall in line with state law so the council can check it off their list but there will be no significant changes. There will be no expansion of citizen authority to act directly. The public input times are a joke. This kind of input requires dialogue even if it is uncomfortable and messy. That's democracy people. It isn't something you simply throw out in an email or shoved into some horribly limited speaking time.
Where is the public input opportunity in this public meeting on public business? Looks to me like they should be having these meetings in the train station. The people are getting railroaded.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that meetings are open to the public does not mean that all meetings include arrangements for public comment. There are two public hearings and there is a means of submitting comment to the Charter Commission. All this, plus schedules, agendas, and minutes are on the City web at http://www.cor.net/index.aspx?page=2019
DeleteFeeding their faces. More mouths to feed.
ReplyDeleteHmm. There is a concerted effort to distinguish residents from citizens. Sounds like sanctuary city language to me.
ReplyDeleteI will watch this later, but is there any place in the video that has new news or anything controversial? So far, it's "and ... or ... comma ... capitalize ..." All important to the correctness of the document, but not exactly must-see-TV.
ReplyDeleteThanks.
Grammar and punctuation are important because these people do not seem to grasp the importance of the working aspects of the document. And all the while Pete Smith is telling telling them these are not material changes. But they are very big changes!
ReplyDeleteThe charter's purpose is to limit their authority. And to define what limited authority they do have.
The last time Pete Smith was charged to charter changes, he actually offered such vague language the council can call a meeting anywhere in the world. It was bad enough they called one while in Austin in 2006. But then that explains the change to legitimize the 2006 improper meeting. Oh, and did I mention the meeting was a closed session? At that time they had no authority to have a closed session.
CDH
Look. The make up of the commission with little exception tells you what you need to know. This commission is intended to fix a bit to fall in line with state law so the council can check it off their list but there will be no significant changes. There will be no expansion of citizen authority to act directly. The public input times are a joke. This kind of input requires dialogue even if it is uncomfortable and messy. That's democracy people. It isn't something you simply throw out in an email or shoved into some horribly limited speaking time.
ReplyDelete